The problem with scheduling software is that complexity makes many people choose between guiding their project progress, or just being buried in the software itself. It seems like this would further broaden your appeal to those who engage in a wide-range of project management methodologies. As not all projects are waterfall by nature, provide an option to build the Project Plan or WBS via a mind-mapping-like front end and provide an option for some portion of a project's functionality to include project methods that are iterative or short structured-runs. Aside from being 'Project' guy I'm also a Mind-Mapper and a creature who likes features! My last recommendation is a big-stretch without a doubt, I know but here it goes. The ability to move a Task/Milestone under an indented project structured without the given having to be indented first.ģ. A breakout TimeLine for Milestone or Other Summary (IES) or a Project Summary Level Road-Map View, if you will.Ģ. Since your team has raised the bar of QPP this far, go-forward enhancements I hope the development team will also consider are:ġ. And' the 'sub-project' feature was well thought-out. The integration with other Project and GTD Apps as well as email is certainly an appreciated feature. As a stand-alone App I think QPP is thet good.Īdditionally, QPP fits quite nicely with most all of my non-professionally based projects and integrates just as well with my professionally based projects.
I recommended it to several of my friends and the architects who were always reluctant to such a tool, are very interested and starting to get into too.Īs with many folks I don't often script reviews but I'm drafting this just 3-days post total knee replacement. I tested and worked with planning software for a long time, this is probably the best concept of user friendliness and ease of usage I ever used. And they are open for any suggestion which makes sense to them. Reaction of the software people is amazing fast and competent. Sharing with collaborators works fine too, respecting the caveats not using the project at the same time. So thanks to iCloud integration it can be handled with all three devices. I am using the iPhone App as well and also the Mac version. Integration with contacts is also a very good idea.
#Quickplan for mac reviews pdf
Printout via PDF is also very practice oriented. It is very intuitive and fits to my needs. Handling it on an iPad is maybe the best adoption of a program from a desktop to tablet. After working with for my first construction project I can conclude, that this is an excellent tool to plan and control a project. Looking for a userfriendly and easy to handle tool, I found Quick Plan. But don’t expect the app to create an optimal (or even feasible) project schedule for you, or to report when your handcrafted schedule is unworkable. It’s okay if you are satisfied with manually managing task dependencies and resource conflicts. start as late as possible.įinally, metrics and project stats are really lacking. No way to set tasks to start as early as possible vs.
No provision to specify end and compute latest start date. Third, app assumes that you have a known start and want to compute the finish. Critical path calculations become meaningless. If you create a two tasks and make one a predecessor of the other then the app won’t properly enforce start-before-finish when start or duration changes, and won’t remove float if predecessor duration shortens or task finishes early. Second, the app does not respect task dependencies. App provides no indication that there’s a conflict, and no way to auto-schedule activities to remove the conflict. Unfortunately the scheduling logic is sorely lacking some basic features for a project management tool.įirst, while the app allows you to assign resources to a task, it doesn’t prevent you from having multiple simultaneous tasks all using the same resource. App looks good and the user interface works well.
0 kommentar(er)
